[Berita hangat] Video Viral Menangis untuk Prabowo: Usai Debat Capres

Adelas Adela

The recent presidential debate in Jakarta sparked intense discussions and reactions, particularly regarding the scores given to Prabowo Subianto by Anies Baswedan and Ganjar Pranowo. One video showing Prabowo’s saddened expression went viral, leading to an outpouring of sympathy from netizens. This sentiment analysis conducted by Drone Emprit reveals that the video had a positive impact on the perception of Prabowo. However, negative sentiments towards Prabowo also emerged, fueled by criticism of his refusal to disclose defense data and his perceived emotional reactions during the debate. Let’s delve deeper into the analysis of the sentiments surrounding Prabowo’s performance in the debate.

Presidential Debate Reactions: Video of Prabowo’s Sadness Goes Viral

The recent presidential debate in Jakarta has sparked a wave of reactions and discussions among the public. One particular moment that has caught the attention of netizens is a video showing Prabowo Subianto’s saddened expression during the debate. This video quickly went viral, leading to an outpouring of sympathy and support for Prabowo. The emotional impact of this video has resonated with many people, highlighting the power of visual storytelling in shaping public perception. Let’s take a closer look at the impact of this video on the overall sentiment surrounding Prabowo’s performance in the debate.

Positive Impact of the Video

The viral video depicting Prabowo’s sadness has had a significant positive impact on public sentiment towards him. Many netizens have expressed their empathy and solidarity with Prabowo, sharing the video as a symbol of support. This outpouring of emotion has not only humanized Prabowo but has also garnered admiration for his resilience in the face of intense criticism. Additionally, Prabowo’s statement emphasizing the importance of safeguarding defense data has resonated with a majority of the public, further enhancing his image as a true statesman. The video and Prabowo’s stance on defense matters have contributed to a surge in positive sentiment towards him.

Negative Sentiments Towards Prabowo

However, amidst the sympathy and support, negative sentiments towards Prabowo have also emerged. Some netizens have criticized him for his refusal to disclose defense data to the public, questioning the need for secrecy in this matter. Furthermore, the circulation of another video showing Prabowo’s supporters using offensive language towards Anies Baswedan has added to the negative sentiment surrounding Prabowo. Additionally, Prabowo’s perceived emotional reactions during the debate have raised concerns among netizens about his ability to maintain composure and make rational decisions under pressure. Criticisms have also been directed towards his statements regarding Gaza, the extent of his land ownership, the substantial expenditure on used military equipment, and a video allegedly showing his campaign team approaching the debate moderator. These factors have contributed to a mixed sentiment towards Prabowo, highlighting the complexity of public opinion in response to the debate.

Anies Baswedan and Ganjar Pranowo’s Attacks on Prabowo Subianto


The recent presidential debate witnessed a series of intense attacks on Prabowo Subianto by Anies Baswedan and Ganjar Pranowo. The candidates engaged in heated discussions, covering various topics, including Prabowo’s performance as the Minister of Defense. These attacks have sparked widespread interest and generated significant discussions among viewers. Let’s delve deeper into the details of these confrontations and their implications for the candidates.

Scores Given by Ganjar and Anies

During the debate, Ganjar Pranowo gave Prabowo Subianto a score of 5, while Anies Baswedan rated him 11 out of 100 as the Minister of Defense. These scores reflect the contrasting perspectives of the candidates regarding Prabowo’s capabilities in this crucial role. Ganjar’s lower rating suggests a more critical evaluation of Prabowo’s performance, while Anies’ higher rating indicates a relatively more positive view. The differing scores shed light on the candidates’ assessments of Prabowo’s track record and competence in defense matters, further fueling the discussions surrounding his performance.

Netizens’ Reaction to the Attacks on Prabowo

The intense attacks launched by Anies Baswedan and Ganjar Pranowo on Prabowo Subianto during the debate have not gone unnoticed by netizens. The online community has been actively engaged in sharing their reactions and opinions on social media platforms. Many users have expressed their sympathy for Prabowo, particularly in response to videos showcasing his emotional state during the confrontations. These emotional reactions have sparked lively discussions and debates online, with some netizens showing solidarity with Prabowo, while others critically analyze the impact of these attacks on his campaign. The widespread response from netizens highlights the significant role of social media in shaping public opinion during political events, further emphasizing the importance of understanding and interpreting these reactions.

Analysis of Sentiments Towards Prabowo’s Performance

The analysis of sentiments surrounding Prabowo Subianto’s performance in the presidential debate has revealed a diverse range of opinions and reactions from the public. Let’s explore the positive and negative sentiments expressed towards Prabowo and gain a deeper understanding of the public’s perception.

Positive Sentiments Towards Prabowo


Prabowo Subianto has garnered significant positive sentiments, thanks to the viral videos that have shown support and empathy towards him. Netizens have shared these videos as a form of solidarity towards Prabowo, who was relentlessly attacked during the debate. Additionally, memes and edited statements of Prabowo have received positive responses from the online community. His statement emphasizing the importance of maintaining the confidentiality of defense data has also been appreciated by a majority of the public. Prabowo is seen as a true statesman for taking such action, further enhancing his positive image.

Negative Sentiments Towards Prabowo

On the other hand, Prabowo Subianto has also faced negative sentiments from a portion of netizens. Criticisms have been directed towards his refusal to disclose defense data to the public. Some observers argue that there is no valid reason for keeping such information confidential. Furthermore, the circulation of a video showing Prabowo’s supporters using offensive language towards Anies Baswedan has added to the negative sentiment surrounding Prabowo. Netizens have also raised concerns about Prabowo’s emotional reactions during the debate, questioning his ability to remain composed and make rational decisions under pressure. Criticisms have also been voiced regarding his statements about Gaza, the extent of his land ownership, the substantial expenditure on used military equipment, and a video allegedly showing his campaign team approaching the debate moderator. These factors have contributed to a mixed sentiment towards Prabowo, reflecting the complexity of public opinion in response to the debate.

The recent presidential debate in Jakarta sparked intense discussions and reactions, particularly regarding the scores given to Prabowo Subianto by Anies Baswedan and Ganjar Pranowo. One video showing Prabowo’s saddened expression went viral, leading to an outpouring of sympathy from netizens. This sentiment analysis conducted by Drone Emprit reveals that the video had a positive impact on the perception of Prabowo. However, negative sentiments towards Prabowo also emerged, fueled by criticism of his refusal to disclose defense data and his perceived emotional reactions during the debate. Let’s delve deeper into the analysis of the sentiments surrounding Prabowo’s performance in the debate. Read more here.

Leave a Comment